On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:25:43 +0200
Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi(_at_)iki(_dot_)fi> wrote:
Since the original VISCII data came (I think) from the Unicode web
site, maybe this discrepancy should be more reported even more officially?
I doubt whether the Unicode consortium had provided
any viscii-Unicode mapping table
under www.unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/.
I could suppose the table shipped on Perl was borrowed
from czyborra.com. The table there
( http://czyborra.com/charsets/vietnamese.html )
has wrongly the duplicated <A^?> and no <a^?>.
The following site provides a correct table.
http://www.vietstd.org/document/unicode.html
SADAHIRO Tomoyuki
