On 30 Jun 2004, at 17:25, Eric Cholet wrote:
Le 30 juin 04, à 14:46, Richard Jolly a écrit :
In my original mail the offending line was:
<title>The Modern R&eacute;sum&eacute;</title>
Now this is a bit off, because is RSS, therefore utf8, but its got
encoded latin1 entities (é) in there, with the & further
encoded for xml safety.
I'm no XML expert, but this doesn't look right. An e acute is é
whereas &eacute is é. It's not "safer", it's different.
IMHO the double encoding is in the XML data itself.
Definitely the original rss is messed up - it shouldn't need é,
because it should be utf8. The script I wrote was an attempt to get the
xml back to how the utf8 should be, and then html-encode it for web
display (for legacy reasons I can't display it as utf8). The garbage
I'm finding in RSS feeds is terrible, I just came across:
<title>BCCI confirms India A&Acirc;Â’s Zimbabwe tour</title>
in a supposedly utf8 feed (see my post on perlmonks at
http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=370892 )
Also, saying é et al are "latin1" entities doesn't make
sense to me, since entities are a way to encode non ASCII characters
into an ASCII representation-- this is orthogonal to the XML document's
encoding or the XML parser's output encoding.
True - I keep struggling to find the right terminology. I've moved to
using 'html-encoding' to indicate using named entities such as
é, but thats still not very good.
--
Eric Cholet
