I think I answered my own question. Here goes. The outer ":0fhw"
is incorrect and can simply be replaced by ":0".
Right?
Bonus question:
On the Internet, which is most embarassing?
(a) asking a stupid question
(b) answering your own stupid question an hour or two later
(c) answering your own stupid question incorrectly
== Bob
On Feb 14, 11:53am PST, b_weissm(_at_)kla(_dot_)com (Bob Weissman) wrote:
The following recipe gives me "Extraneous filter-flag ignored":
# Some stupid Microsoft email program adds unreadable uuencoded junk.
:0fhw
* ^X-Ms-Attachment: WINMAIL\.DAT
{
:0fbw
|sed '/^begin [0-7][0-7][0-7] WINMAIL\.DAT$/,$d'
}
procmailrc(5) says
On a nesting block,
the flags `H' and `B' only affect the conditions
leading up to the block, the flags `h' and `b' have no
effect whatsoever.
I can't quite decipher the language of the man page. What is procmail
complaining about? The outer 'h'? The inner 'b'? Or the inner 'f'?
-- End of excerpt from b_weissm(_at_)kla(_dot_)com