procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re^4: VARIABLE=result of sed?

1997-07-14 22:01:00
Stan Ryckman <stanr(_at_)sunspot(_dot_)tiac(_dot_)net> wrote:

Stan> Note... the backticks and pipe really have nothing to do with the syntax
Stan> confusion... consider these much simpler examples analogous to the above;
Stan> if you relate these to the man pages, then the more complicated cases
Stan> should make sense:
Stan> 
Stan> 1)  By itself:
Stan>         X=2
Stan> does what you expect.
Stan> 
Stan> 2)  In a recipe action line:
Stan>         :0
Stan>         * conditions
Stan>         X=2
Stan> delivers to file "X=2"
Stan> 
Stan> 3)  In a recipe:
Stan>         :0
Stan>         * conditions
Stan>         { X=2 }
Stan> probably does what you expect, setting the variable X to "2".

Thanks. I finally understood what Era was trying to tell me.

Stan> Another point I don't know if Philip covers... the above examples, setting
Stan> HEAD, could produce amusing results if somewhere else the .procmailrc
Stan> assumes that $HEAD evaluates to /bin/head (or wherever it is)   :-)

Is there any suggested rule on naming variables?

_/_/_/      Mitsuru FURUKAWA      _/_/_/
_/_/_/        Tokyo, Japan        _/_/_/
_/_/_/     mailto:furu(_at_)009(_dot_)com    _/_/_/
_/_/_/  http://www.009.com/furu/  _/_/_/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>