David W. Tamkin writes on 13 September 1997 at 16:33:45
| | :0BD
| | * !^(In-Reply-To:|References:|Subject:[ ]*Re(\[[0-9]+\])?:).+
I think that condition needs "H ??".
yup.
| | * [^>]*FREE
Perhaps Dan meant * ^[^>]*FREE to look for the word with no citation.
ditto. Just checking for "FREE" itself will trap email messages
discussing SPAM, hopefully the header check (when done correctly) will
let messages like this slip through.
Jari Aalto writes on 13 September 1997 at 16:42:05
| Sat 13.9.97 "J. Daniel Smith"
<dans(_at_)handel(_dot_)eu(_dot_)bristol(_dot_)com>
| I've appended my current spamcheck.rc file below.
Exellent contribution. Thank you! Would you set up file server
so that people can get this fileter by email.
"send procmail spam-filter"
I have no plans to do this at this point, although I'll probably post
it to the procmail list occasionly when discussion warrants and as
long as it stays small.
Dan
------------------- message is author's opinion only ------------------
J. Daniel Smith <DanS(_at_)bristol(_dot_)com>
http://www.bristol.com/~DanS
Bristol Technology B.V. +31 33 450 50 50, ...51 (FAX)
Amersfoort, The Netherlands {info,jobs}(_at_)bristol(_dot_)com