On Wed, 24 Mar 1999 10:00:52 +1000, "Damon Pullen"
<DP-Pullen(_at_)dot(_dot_)tas(_dot_)gov(_dot_)au> wrote:
Has anyone any information on the Year 2000 compliance of procamail?
I dont expect it to be date dependent .. but you never know :)
It's basically compliant. This is now in the FAQ which ships with
3.12; <http://www.procmail.org/procmail-3.12/FAQ> (question #18).
You could search the archives for more information; there have been
some brief discussions about this previously. There is a y2038 problem
if compiled on a compiler which has a y2038 problem but that's hardly
surprising or particularly troublesome.
Hope this helps,
/* era */
--
.obBotBait: It shouldn't even matter whether <http://www.iki.fi/era/>
I am a resident of the state of Washington. <http://members.xoom.com/procmail/>
* Sign the European spam petition! <http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/en/> *