On Fri, 4 Jun 1999, era eriksson wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jun 1999 20:29:17 -0700 (PDT),
"Colin J. Raven" <cjraven(_at_)quik(_dot_)com> wrote:
> I just finished reading searched results on procmail.org concerning the
> exclusion of attachments using procmail. The few hits seem to indicate
> that it's either;
> a) highly impractical to use procmail to perform this function or
> b) procmail should/could be sued to exclude email over a defined size.
> My question is this; What about the _specific_ exclusion of one _named_
> attachment only?
If all you're looking for is a quick answer to your question, check
out <ftp://ftp.rubyriver.com/pub/jhardin/antispam/procmail-security.html>
Yes. That filter allows you to poison attachments by name.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
jhardin(_at_)wolfenet(_dot_)com
pgpk -a finger://gonzo.wolfenet.com/jhardin PGP key ID: 0x41EA94F5
PGP key fingerprint: A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5 E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Efficiency can magnify good, but it magnifies evil just as well.
So, we should not be surprised to find that modern electronic
communication magnifies stupidity as *efficiently* as it magnifies
intelligence.
-- Robert A. Matern
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
96 days until 9/9/99