procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ping-recipe

1999-08-07 16:23:02
but had to change back the ^TO_( to
( 
(and I remember having had that problem before) 
because it didn't catch "To: <postmaster(_at_)isolution(_dot_)nl>". 
(probably because of the < and > ) 

Hardly. Does it get expanded correctly? All the versions of ^TO_ which
actually work are basically the same and don't have a problem with <>
so your Procmail is probably old. (1001 reasons to upgrade.)


Yeah, my Procmail is old (3.10): 
the TO_ was expanded as TO and an underscore. 
Oh well, reason enough. 


Regards, "Dr." Ruud

Chaos rules





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • ping-recipe, Ruud H.G. van Tol
    • Re: ping-recipe, Ruud H.G. van Tol <=