On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
jm>
jm>
jm> Here's what I'm using, but perhaps it's not optimal.
jm>
jm>
jm> :0 fwh
jm> * ^TO_procmail(_at_)informatik(_dot_)rwth-aachen(_dot_)de
jm> | formail -I "X-From-Procmail-list: yes"
jm>
jm> :0 c
jm> * ^TO_procmail(_at_)informatik(_dot_)rwth-aachen(_dot_)de
jm> ! some-other-address
jm>
jm>
Well, your checking the headers twice, not sure if thats a big slow down
or not, but you could avoid it by doing the following
:0fwh
* ^TO_procmail(_at_)informatik(_dot_)rwth-aachen(_dot_)de
| formail -I "X-From-Procmail-list: yes"
:0ac
! some-other-address
jm>
jm> The "some-other-address" filters it based on the addition of the X-From...
jm> header which it can find.
jm>
jm> It doesn't have the sexy TO_ macro, nor a powerful regex language, hence
jm> the desire to use procmail first.
jm>
jm>
jm> Should I nest these rules?
jm>
jm> Or is this OK.
jm>
jm>
--
S.Toms - tomas(_at_)primenet(_dot_)com - New homepage coming soon
SuSE Linux v6.2+ - Kernel 2.2.13
Genius, n.:
A chemist who discovers a laundry additive that rhymes with
"bright".