procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Is this feasible?

2000-12-29 15:09:27
Joe Hagerty wrote:
It seems straight forward enough for me, just wanting a second opinion.

Sure, the procmail part shouldn't be too hard, especially if the perl
script is already written.  A few things to watch for...

1. Some mailers insert blanks between the ':' and the first character
   of subject, e.g. "Subject:  blah" vs "Subject: blah"; this can be
   handled using "formail -zxsubject:"

2. Email may arrive without a "Subject:" field.  Will it be sent to
   /dev/null, create an auto-reply, get bounced...?

3. Will the perl script handle "Re: blah" or "Re^2: blah" (or even
   worse, "FW: blah" and "fwd: blah") correctly?  Or does your
   procmail script have to handle removal of prefixes (or do you
   consider "blah" and the above 3 to all be different subjects)?

4. Some mailers insert extra space/s after the "Re:" so that if an
   original message have "Subject: blah" then a reply may have
   "Subject: Re:  blah"

-- 
Neither I nor my employer will accept any liability for any problems
or consequential loss caused by relying on this information.  Sorry.
Collin Park                         Not a statement of my employer.
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>