Philip Guenther wrote:
mike polniak <mikpolniak(_at_)adelphia(_dot_)net> writes:
Philip Guenther wrote:
The one exception is (I think) Lotus Notes which, in violation
of RFC822 (and now RFC2822), ignores the header sender fields (From:,
Sender:, Reply-To:) in favor of the envelope sender (SMTP's MAIL FROM:).
Has RFC822 been updated? I did a search for RFC2822 and got zero
results.
The IESG approved the draft produced by the DRUMS working group and passed
it to the RFC editor for publication with the (strong?) suggestion that
it be given the number 2822. It hasn't actually hit the archives yet,
but if you want to see what it looks like you can look up the last draft
in the DRUMS area at www.ietf.org. The only change made by the IESG
from draft-ietf-drums-msg-fmt-09.txt was to tweak the working of the
"line length" section (no semantic change).
Thanks. I did'nt find anything in the draft referring to "X-"
user-defined field names. What does this imply about using them, if anything?
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail