On 21 Feb, Timothy J. Luoma wrote in resonse to Asim Zuberi:
|
| > :0:*^TO
| >
+(sunmanagers(_at_)sunmanagers(_dot_)org)|(sun-managers(_at_)sunmanagers(_dot_)org)|(sunmana
| > gers(_at_)sunhelp(_dot_)org)|(sun-managers(_at_)ECECS(_dot_)UC(_dot_)EDU)
| > SUNmanagers
|
| [...]
|
| I think you could re-write the above to be a bit simpler (this actually will
| match a few cases you didn't include, but I don't think that's a problem
|
| :0:
| *
^TO((sunmanagers|sun-managers)@(sunmanagers\.org|sunhelp\.org|ECECS\.UC\.EDU))
| SUNmanagers
Which can be simplified still further if, as TjL says, the possiblity
of matching something like "sun-managers(_at_)sunhelp(_dot_)org" is not a
problem.
That would seem like a reasonable risk to take until proven wrong.
:0
* ^TO(sun-?managers@(sun(managers|help)\.org|ececs\.uc\.edu))
SUNmanagers
| (I'm not familiar with what ^TO+ is supposed to do, was that intentional?)
Nor am I. In fact I'll confess to not using the ^TO and ^TO_ patterns
at all and not knowing which is more appropriate here. Let alone the
effect of modifying one with '+'.
--
/"\ Don Hammond
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
X AGAINST HTML MAIL,
/ \ AND NEWS TOO
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail