I disagree very strongly. The `E' flag is much quicker for procmail to
process than a search of the headers for an "X-Note:" entry (even if you
still filter through the formail filter to add the X-Note: so that you can
see it on the delivered message). Then again, just sending the message to
an indicatively named folder can take the place of adding a header line.
Will the E flag work under these conditions:
:0
conditions 1
{ }
:0E
conditions 2
{ }
:0E
conditions 3
{ }
That if the first is TRUE then both the 2nd and 3rd will *not* execute?
If you must use that X-Note: system, at least put the !^X-Note: condition
*first*.
Yup, that's clearly a better idea if using the X-Note:
Finally, Timothy, why did you add carets to the conditions? Marie never said
that they were left-anchored regexps; some or all of them might not be reg-
exps at all.
Point taken. 99% of the stuff I do is always left anchored, so I get to
thinking that way.
TjL
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail