freddie(_at_)tumsan(_dot_)fi writes:
bummer. it looks like procmail uses username$LOCKEXT
while my pop daemon uses .username.pop
Nope. .username.pop isn't a lockfile.
sigh, this is getting silly. is there a way to do it so it also uses the dot?
Not without hacking the source
...but since .username.pop isn't a lockfile, there's no reason to do that.
this is qpopper 4.0.3, which supposedly also supports flock()
plus this is (i hear) the most widely used linux pop daemon, so im depressed
why this shows up for me, and nobody else. maybe the problem lies elsewhere...
Are procmail and qpopper running on the same machine? Is the mailspool
NFS mounted anywhere? What is the output of "procmail -v"?
Philip Guenther
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail