procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Esd-l] X-Unsent: header as way of recognizing mass mailing worms

2001-11-29 22:41:44
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Howard Lowndes wrote:

John, are all these tweaks going onto the web site as they are
created/modified? 

Some are, some aren't. I'm still debating whether the X-Unsent trap
should go in the recommended local rules.

I'm kinda losing track of where IMPSEC is up to and am thinking I
should do a full pull down again.

Full pull? Are you maintaining a mirror site? If so, let's set up
rsync so it's automated.

Perhaps a change datestamp as well as / instead of a version
number might help.

The RCS id line (in a small font near the end of each page) contains
the date the file was last checked into revision control as well as
the revision number. I check the pages in every time I make changes.

--
 John Hardin KA7OHZ    ICQ#15735746    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 jhardin(_at_)impsec(_dot_)org                       pgpk -a 
jhardin(_at_)wolfenet(_dot_)com
  768: 0x41EA94F5 - A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5  E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76 
 1024: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
  In 1998 more than three times as many people in the US were killed
  by incompetent physicians than were killed by handguns, yet the
  President of the A.M.A. is adopting "gun safety" as his platform.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
   1069 days until the Presidential Election


_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>