crap...
in message <20020310071407(_dot_)GB740(_at_)moo(_dot_)holy(_dot_)cow>,
wrote parv thusly...
i am trying to filter mail w/ following recipe ('\t' is actual tab)...
...
* 2147483647^0 \
^Subject:.*\<(d(igi(tal)?)?[ \t]*slr|digi(tal)?[
\t]*(film|popular|camera|minolta|maxxum))
...
...w/ subject lines like this...
Subject: Re: Re: DIGITAL Vs. FILM Archival Properties
...what's wrong w/ the above regex? shouldn't "digi(tal)[ \t]*
(film|...)" have caught the above mail?
argh! never mind, i found the error. it was not procmail who was
idiosyncratic ... i created the OR'd 2d regex from the first one,
and forgot to replace "[ \t]*" w/ ".*"
i apologize for my ADD.
- parv
--
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail