Erik wrote that he's doing this on his incoming copies of articles from this
list:
| :0:
| * ^From procmail-admin
| | formail -i"Reply-To: procmail-users(_at_)procmail(_dot_)org" >>
~/mail/in/procmail_u
Ruud is doing something similar.
It occurs to me, though, that it might be better to use formail's -a option
than -i. If a poster specifically wants private replies and has submitted
the post with a Reply-To: line back to him/herself for that reason,
formail -i will shunt it off to Old-Reply-To:, and then Ruud or Erik will
reply publicly on the list, contrary to the poster's wishes. Perhaps it is
better to use formail's -a option and add Reply-To: only if the poster hasn't
taken a stand on the issue.
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail