procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Odd behavior or incorrect recipe?

2002-04-18 20:59:13
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 the voices made Bart Schaefer write:

Egad.  Seven processes where you could get by with zero?

 Damn it, had my finger on the sendbutton when I got this; give us non-gurus a
chance to post our updated "that first one was somewhat stupid"-solutions
before you start showing off. ;-)

* ^X-Spam-Status:.*hits=\/[-0-9.]+

 Shouldn't that leading "-" be at the end of the [], just to be on the safe
side; or has that never been an issue when it comes to procmail?

        /Tony
-- 
 +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
 | Per scientiam ad libertatem! // Through knowledge towards freedom! |
 | Genom kunskap mot frihet! =*= (c) 1999-2002 tony(_at_)svanstrom(_dot_)org 
=*= |
 +--------------------------------------------------------------------+

_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>