in message <029601c24c14$6dab3970$6819a8c0(_at_)isolution(_dot_)nl>,
wrote Ruud H.G. van Tol thusly...
parv skribis:
to repent, below is the corrected moderately cautious version...
:0
* ^Subject:[ ]*\[\/[^]]+\]
{
:0:
* MATCH ?? ()\/[^]]+
IN-${MATCH}
}
Is (almost)[1] the same as (at least in recent versions):
:0:
* ^Subject:[ ]*\[\/[^]]+\]
* MATCH ?? ()\/[^]]+
IN-${MATCH}
recently i have been creating recipe/s/ which come into existence
only after satisfying top controlling condition(s)...
:0
* blah
{
:0
* recipe 1
...
:0:
* recipe 2
...
}
out of that habit, comes the above.
which is the same as
:0:
* ^Subject:[ ]*\[\/[^]]+
IN-${MATCH}
not really, to pick nits, as that will match...
Subject: [polka ; in pennsylvania
Subject: [polka-dot bikini & tie
...in case of missing ']', wouldn't the above recipe will match both
subjects "polka.+nia" and "polka.+tie". otoh, this may be
reasonable enough for the OP.
- parv
--
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail