On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 11:54:14AM -0700, Jon Brinkmann wrote:
Any ideas?
Yes, despite the other 99% of egrep syntax that works with procmail,
'pattern{m,n}' doesn't.
And it's a shame how difficult that is to search for in the archives,
because while I know what the problem is, I couldn't think of an
appropiate term to do a search one either.
--
Till Later, Jake <karrde+procmail(_at_)viluppo(_dot_)net>
-----------------------------------------------
Direct replys are likley to be flagged as spam.
Drop the +addy if you need to reply direct.
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail