On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 4:35:42PM -0500, David wrote:
My mailer would destroy the long lines in Jim's excerpts, so I'm going
to have to break them badly for this message before it gets a chance to
break them catastrophically.
I debated with myself about leaving them long or breaking them. The
team that thought the raw form would be clearer won out; next time I'll
break them. :)
No idea why you don't combine those two
Just the fact that debug code sort of evolves on the fly, and keeping
it broken into smaller chunks sometimes makes it easier to add or
subtract things. There's certainly no issue of efficiency.
The first one includes a semicolon, which is in $SHELLMETAS. The
second has no characters from $SHELLMETAS. That means that
procmail will invoke a shell to run the first one but will run the
second one itself.
Ah HA!!! Now I know how to revert to my preferred ${basename##*/};
Thanks for clearing up two questions in one easy answer!
Jim
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail