Udi Mottelo schreef:
* .*\/[^>]+
* MATCH ?? .*<\/.+
At the left of the \/ there is minimal matching, so the ".*" will always
exactly match 0 characters, so it has no use there.
Since you want the "<" in the MATCH, and Tad used a "^" anchor, I think
that you meant:
* ^<\/[^>]+>:
* MATCH ?? ^^\/[^>]+
which is still far less accurate than what Dallman suggested.
--
Grtz, Ruud
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail