On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 01:48:39PM -0500, Philip Gladstone wrote:
| A number of comments:
|
| * I think that there ought to be a mechanism extension mechanism. For
| example, a mechanism of the form 'x-whatever' would be processed if
| known, otherwise it is ignored. Otherwise, you have to use
| 'include:whateverrecord' and 'whateverrecord IN TXT "x-whatever"' to
| have the same effect.
Thanks for the comments. I was trying to think of a use case for this,
but my imagination failed me. Can you set up a plausible scenario?
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.6.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡