Re: Another macro letter required besides 'i'

--wayne <wayne(_at_)midwestcs(_dot_)com> wrote:
> > > What would "exists:%{c}.foo.example.com" do when you are using IPv4?
> > The same as "exists:%{i}.foo.example.com".
> Then you are saying that for the most part we should replace all uses
> of %{i} with %{c}?

I think he is just saying that %{c} is a prettier/more readable form of 
%{i}, and they can return the same string for v4.

--
Greg Connor <gconnor(_at_)nekodojo(_dot_)org>