spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: questions about postfix implementation

2004-03-29 08:21:54
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Meng Weng Wong spewed into the bitstream:

MWW>On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 09:09:18PM -0500, Chuck Mead wrote:
MWW>| Okay so I've implemented the policy-spf perl script into postfix
MWW>| 2.0.19-20040312 and it's working as far as it goes. I've also added the
MWW>| spf entries to dns domains I send mail from. I now have questions about
MWW>| what I am seeing and questions about how to get the policy-spf perl
MWW>| script to do more than just spew nice entires into my maillog. :-)
MWW>| 
MWW>| Here is the log from a typical spam attempt (it even includes a limp
MWW>| wristed HELO using an ip instead of a name):
MWW>
MWW>you probably need to enable the SPF handler.
MWW>
MWW>  my @HANDLERS;
MWW>  push @HANDLERS, "testing";
MWW># push @HANDLERS, "sender_permitted_from"; use Mail::SPF::Query;
MWW>
MWW>i probably need to turn that on by default.

Ah-ha! I will investigate that this evening! Thanks for the nudge! :-)

- -- 
csm
Lunar Linux Project Lead
Disclaimer: "I am not a curmudgeon! No... really..."
Addendum: "Bwahahaha! Fire up the orbital mind-control lasers!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAaD8Uq3bny/5+GAcRAjZZAJ4nT1T9lXh2QPBnZorDuZBV/Nus2ACfdp4c
Sbp1xGCC+Y+50TUuzpoWOTM=
=zEgC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----