Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA.

Meng wrote:

Microsoft has shown strong support for the PRA in the headers.


Really? Microsoft's Outlook Express does not display the PRA.
It shows the display name as the email address.

Roger

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Meng Weng Wong Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Andy Bakun Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., wayne Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Greg Connor Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Jim Hill RE: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., John Glube Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Roger Moser <= RE: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., John Glube RE: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., John Glube RE: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., John Glube Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Greg Connor Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., jpinkerton Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Frank Ellermann Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., william(at)elan.net Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., spf Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Michael Hammer