Then maybe we should say that once the mail is accepted, a failed SPF check
MUST not generate a bounce message. Since the bounce will likely not go to
the sender.
Guy
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com] On Behalf Of Mark
Lentczner
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 1:03 PM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] 2.3 Checking Authorization
On Oct 14, 2004, at 8:58 AM, Guy wrote:
If the SPF check is not done when it is received, then how will the
error be
returned to the sender? Malformed domain! What about forged
addresses,
would you send a bounce back to the forged address? Not good! This
is what
SPF is trying to stop!
There is no requirement to return the SPF check status to the sender.
The Fail status (and reason code) can tagged on the message (perhaps
via a header) and the MUA can then decided to junk the message, or show
it to the user, or whatever.
I agree that if the SPF check is performed after mail is accepted, it
is not a good idea to bounce messages with Fail status.
- Mark
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
http://www.InboxEvent.com/?s=d --- Inbox Event Nov 17-19 in Atlanta features
SPF and Sender ID.
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com