Roger Moser wrote:
http://www.spfhelp.com/downloads/draft-lyon-senderid-core-00.txt
Apparently not yet published by the IETF.
I found a mistake in this draft:
Yes, that's probably a typo. But there are more bugs in this
memo:
| A compliant domain SHOULD publish authorizations for every
| defined scope.
Of course it SHOULD NOT define the PRA scope without prior
consent of all affected users. Especially big ISPs MUST NOT
define the PRA scope unless their resources for end-user
support are virtually unlimited...
| an "spf2.0/pra ?all" record
...oops, okay, here's another possible solution for big ISPs.
[If mfrom == pra]
| In this case, domains SHOULD publish their information using
| an SPF record with the prefix "v=spf1". Doing so will render
| their published information usable by the older SPF protocol,
| too.
Ridiculous rubbish. Bye, Frank