In <x4d5xkwzaf(_dot_)fsf(_at_)footbone(_dot_)midwestcs(_dot_)com> wayne
<wayne(_at_)schlitt(_dot_)net> writes:
The FTC has updated their website on the email authentication summit
that was held a month ago. [...]
See: http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/workshops/e-authentication/
I've been reviewing these presentations. Most of them are quite
short.
Ones I found most interesting are:
Microsoft on SenderID
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/workshops/e-authentication/presentations/11-9-04_katz_Microsoft.pdf
Page 4: "SPF vs Cryptographic Encryption"
Drawbacks to SPF: Weaknesses in the Purported Sender Algorthims
This is exactly what I'm talking about with confusion in the market
between SenderID and SPF and how, in front of the FTC, SPF got
tarnished with SenderID problems.
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/workshops/e-authentication/presentations/11-9-04_brown_ColdSpark.pdf
GoDaddy on SPF
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/workshops/e-authentication/presentations/11-9-04_chadwick_GoDaddy.pdf
AOL on SPF, SPF/HELO, SenderID etc.
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/workshops/e-authentication/presentations/11-9-04_hutzler_AOL.pdf
Page 10: all about how thier license is Free/OSS friendly
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/workshops/e-authentication/presentations/11-9-04_libbey_Yahoo!.pdf
Quite a few positive comments about SPF
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/workshops/e-authentication/presentations/11-9-04_schnell_Equifax.pdf
-wayne