Re: Re: MAAWG whitepaper draft (fwd)

spf-discuss

Re: Re: MAAWG whitepaper draft (fwd)

2004-12-13 10:09:36

On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 08:32:18 -0800, Dave Crocker wrote:

  there is no requirement for the x- prefix.


by the way, x- has never been required, since it was introduced in rfc822.  

its use has only ever been optional.

d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
+1.408.246.8253
dcrocker  a t ...
www.brandenburg.com

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: MAAWG whitepaper draft (fwd), william(at)elan.net Re: Re: MAAWG whitepaper draft (fwd), Chris Drake Approaches to system design - Marketing vs Security and why MASG should not be standards group (was: Re: MAAWG whitepaper draft), william(at)elan.net Re: Re: MAAWG whitepaper draft (fwd), Dave Crocker Re: Re: MAAWG whitepaper draft (fwd), Dave Crocker <= RE: Re: MAAWG whitepaper draft (fwd), Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: Re: MAAWG whitepaper draft (fwd), william(at)elan.net

Previous by Date:	Re: Re: MAAWG whitepaper draft (fwd), Dave Crocker
Next by Date:	RE: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, Julian Mehnle
Previous by Thread:	Re: Re: MAAWG whitepaper draft (fwd), Dave Crocker
Next by Thread:	RE: Re: MAAWG whitepaper draft (fwd), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]