In <20050531180225(_dot_)GA7253(_at_)primefactor(_dot_)com> Mark Shewmaker
<mark(_at_)primefactor(_dot_)com> writes:
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 10:02:51AM -0500, wayne wrote:
* The abstract now mentions both the MAIL FROM and HELO identities.
* The "scope" keyword-value pair has been renamed to "identity"
I don't see the advantage in this change of wording:
[...]
Everywhere else in the I-D, the term "identity" is used.
However, there is one remaining issue.
If reciever policy says that a failing mailfrom should be considered a
PASS because the verified HELO is trusted, how is that documented in
received-spf?
Such information could be placed in the comment, just as local policy
information currently is placed there by several SPF implementations.
I haven't thought of a good set of words to use yet, [...]
At this stage of the game, I'm very reluctant to introduce new
concepts.
-wayne