spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02

2005-08-25 11:26:07
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 13:14, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
are you of the opinion that the IESG should try to police which experiments
get run on the Internet by refusing to publish RFCs documenting
possibly-conflicting experments?

It depends on the form of the conflict.

I believe that the IESG has the duty to ensure that concurrent
experiments either use experimental codepoints in non-conflicting ways,
or else require them to use distinct codepoints; to fail to do this
creates the risk that any experimental results will be
muddled/contaminated.

Bingo. There is, after all, an "experiment" in "experimental". A conflict that
stands a good chance of making it imposisble to get useful results from the
experiment is something that clearly needs to be resolved prior to publication.

There's even some support for this in RFC 2026. Section 4.2.1 talks about
experimental publication being subject to "verification that there has been
adequate coordination with the standards process".

Now, this is phrased in terms of conflicts with standards, not conflicts
between experiments, likely because the case of conflicting experiments
was never envisioned.

In this case, the two experiments interpret the same codepoints in the
DNS in subtly different ways.

A mail-sending domain indicates that it is participating by publishing
certain DNS RR's.
Crucially, a mail-sending domain cannot opt in to the SPF experiment
without also opting in to the senderid experiment.  This renders any
claimed results of either experiment suspect.

RIght again.

In any case, I support this appeal to the extent that I believe the conflicts
need to be resolved prior to publication. I take no position on the means
by which the conflict is resolved as long as a resolution is reached.

                                Ned

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>