Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 07:54:49AM -0700, william(at)elan.net wrote:
[...] verifying that SenderID has overtaken SPF in enterprise adoption.
Interesting... According to their own "Top Email Senders by Domain",
13 out of 25 domains publish SPF records and zero domains publish SID.
Yesterday:
SPF: 6195 out of 27775 IPs (22.3%)
SID: 0 out of 27775 IPs (none)
DKIM: 3983 out of 27775 IPs (14.3%)
Last 30 days:
SPF: 9948.36 out of 33108.3 (30.0%)
SID: 0 out of 33108.3 (none)
DKIM: 4031.68 out of 33108.3 (12.2%)
Perhaps more companies published a SID record but according to their
own stats this is not significant.
I'm going to count their spf1 and spf2 records as well. WIP.
I wouldn't bother - they only have 38,125 spf records listed, a tiny fraction of the
1,000,000 or so that are out there. And because of their need to identify the bad-guys,
they are probably skewed to be looking more at spammers than a genuinely representative
sample, so the results are hardly significant.
Slainte
JohnP
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com