On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 18:21:57 +0200 Frank Ellermann
<nobody(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de> wrote:
Scott Kitterman wrote:
unecessary if you are using a shared secret mechanism.
With CRAM-MD5 a "man in the middle" could hijack the session.
That argument seriously hurt draft-hutzler-spamops in its
"IETF last call", and Bruce found some additional nits for
a coup de grace.
Waiting for a new draft: Frank
OK. How about ...with a cryptographically robust shared secret method...
Scott K
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com