On 1/3/06, william(at)elan.net <william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net> wrote:
<snip>
I think you misunderstood. My comment in that paragraph was in regards to
what legal solution should do in general, not in regards to what can-spam
in particular did. As to can-spam I agree with your
interpretation and
what you wrote below i.e. because that can-spam does not go far enough,
it can not solve the problem at the source as legal solution should do.
<snip>
Ah ... so we are in violent agreement.
:-)
- John
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com