-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Scott Kitterman wrote:
On 05/04/2006 19:25, Julian Mehnle wrote:
I'll send a revised announcement draft to spf-private in a few minutes
based on our last draft from just before April Fool's day.
I'd like to gently suggest that this is not why there is an SPF-private
unless there is something competion sensitive in it. I respectfully
request that the Council do it's business in public unless there is a
really strong reason that can't be done.
You're absolutely right. I was still in "April Fool's announcement" mode
when I thought about continuing the announcement preparations on
spf-private. I just sent the draft to spf-council. Thanks for reminding
me.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEWqv7wL7PKlBZWjsRAnocAJ9hPg3l+OUjUD3UWtAXnRcJ7++zhwCffZeQ
kJEaDiQsQAyi/fZMRRGNgQQ=
=oPnn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com