spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

[spf-discuss] Re: SPF Momentum....

2006-05-12 10:50:43
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Scott Kitterman wrote:
As one of the "List Moms" for the spf-help list I get a weekly status
report on subsciption status for that mailing list.  It's been hanging
just under 1500 subscribers for the last 6 months or so.  Since the
subscriber base tends to turn over (people subscribe, get their
questions answered, and leave) I've figured that a level subscriber base
is indicative of a steady rate of growth.

Now I wonder:

http://www.google.com/trends?q=SPF

Note that (at least when I went to the page) the two most recent
referenced news articles are not about our SPF.  I don't think this
trend is good.

All you're basing your doubts on is <http://www.google.com/trends?q=SPF>??

Media exposition sure is a contributing factor to SPF's success, or
"momentum", as you put it, but I don't think it is a good _indicator_ in 
our case.

SPF is a grass-roots technology which best propagates whenever someone 
calls his mail admin and asks why this "SPF" thing has blocked his mail.  
That sort of thing raises awareness with admins (and thus domain owners) 
more than a media article or two or ten (not necessarily positive 
awareness at first, I know, but as long as the facts speak for us, it'll 
be positive in the long run).  Compared to that, adoption by the 100 
biggest ISPs only helps so much.

I admit that pressure actions, such as AOL privileging mail from SPF- 
equipped domains, help a lot, but I'm not sure how much we can influence 
that.  Should we try to approach big ISPs directly?  The question with the 
big ISPs anyway is why they don't consider SPF a valuable solution to a 
real problem.  Lack of awareness can't be the issue among them, can it?

(BTW, I have had private contact with tech representatives of the largest 
Belgian ISP and of one of the largest US banks earlier this year who said 
they were deploying SPF.  So there _is_ movement, it's just not always 
visible on the surface.)

And don't forget that according to various recent studies and news 
articles, the volume of SPF records has grown to ~3 million by now.

I am not a PR guy and I have no idea how this PR stuff works, but I
think we need some.

I agree.

Let's see what media response the upcoming announcement and press release 
bring.  After that, I think we should concentrate our PR efforts on a 
grass-roots "Spread SPF!" campaign as I said during the last council 
election.

I'm very interested however how others see this issue.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEZMXzwL7PKlBZWjsRAv0XAJ4jS5rvauMkF/X8H/ZmKP0cLAfsogCdGL/9
QePaatiglfI5OsYfc1fQA5o=
=BfuB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>