Julian Mehnle wrote:
Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
Based on frequent permerrors, I've determined that people expect
the base domain of relative names to be the domain of the SPF
record, For instance, if they publish
example.com IN SPF "v=spf1 a:mail -all"
what they meant was:
example.com IN SPF "v=spf1 a:mail.example.com -all"
we might even go as far as to require
FQDNs to end in a dot, and declare anything else relative to %{d}.
I could see a syntax like a:mail@ being useful, where the @ means "relative to
the domain of this record."
Perhaps single-token names like "mail" could be specified as
relative-by-default.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com