spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

[spf-discuss] Re: DNS record caching the microsoft way

2006-06-10 07:52:27
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Wayne Schlitt wrote:
The 'i' and 'd' macros aren't actually a problem because they can be
easily cached.  To quote RFC4408 section 8.1. "Macro Definitions": [...]

To be exact, all macros can be cached (except "t", timestamp, of course).  
It just requires a larger cache, statistically.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEitx/wL7PKlBZWjsRAl6mAKCd7Afvrun4nZdIeM3nHSQK81wmagCgpDAx
NSrDKoXp8ET/D3a4+KMbcDs=
=gsJT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com