-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote:
http://www.enterprisenetworkingplanet.com/netsp/article.php/3618306
| [...] The moral is that these solutions are all the same. It's called
| domain verification, and it simply won't work. E-mail has been around
| since the dawn of the Internet, and its model has always been to allow
| everyone access. Quite literally, your e-mail is a file that everyone on
| the Internet is allowed to append things to. To get rid of spam, the
| whole system is going to have to be redone,
I thought, according to Mr Schluting, that that's about what we're doing --
changing the whole system? Oh, wait, he doesn't want the current system
to change because that would break legitimate e-mail.
He better make up his mind or he'll be complaining about e-mail abuse in
2016 still.
Key point: Certain "legitimate" e-mail is indistinguishable from abuse.
Either abolish both or permit both.
| and a complete solution will have to involve a trusted third party.
Uh, what? An intermediary like MS or Verisign? What for, I wonder?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEvrW6wL7PKlBZWjsRAnILAJ4wWzPygTRrVJSIz5JGNg/TJ1g/8ACfY+RA
9UKdih68EDqkpBX+LqZxvdU=
=h7HS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com