On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 11:50:27AM -0700, william(at)elan.net wrote:
The problem is that it is not necessarily good and wanted for forwarder
to tell sender what address the email is being forwarded to - there are
various privacy issues involved. Not to mention that just answering with
address like that will be used by spammers.
I find it useful when the address you provide is your main public address (no
concern leaking it since all spammers already harvested it from the web), and
at the final receiver you have the actual anti-spam filtering stuff.
It is not always possible to apply your filtering policy in the forwarder since
this MTA might be operated by someone else, and you might not have control over
it.
--
Robert Millan
My spam trap is honeypot(_at_)aybabtu(_dot_)com(_dot_) Note: this address is
only intended for
spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list.
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com