-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 05:54:56PM +0000, Julian Mehnle wrote:
The confusion on the term "SPF record" has already reached the point
of no return a long time ago. Like it or not, I think it is mostly
being used now to mean a DNS record of RR type "SPF" or "TXT" carrying
an SPF policy.
That's an opinion too.
Like it or not, but email is primarily used to send spam. Funny, I
always thought that we were here to make things better, not to admit
defeat.
Oh, come on, Alex! We should rather try to get rid of the TXT RR type for
SPF policies in the mid to long term.
If you manage to change the definition of "SPF record" to mean "SPF-type
RR" only, I'm fine with that. I just don't think this is a battle worth
fighting.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFdcqTwL7PKlBZWjsRAvKTAJ0eh23wwee0QwayOJMTp4rcCA3s6QCgz5uV
gtBm6YntGuIFfoHTBArjLt8=
=vYB9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735