On 14-Dec-06, at 9:08 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Here are the results. There were some repititions of tests in the
data, but
this is mostly from unique senders. In particular, the permerror
results
tended to be tested more than once, so the actual permerror rate is
somewhat
lower than the numbers below would indicate.
This is only partially automated, so I may, or may not, do this
again in the
future. No promises.
The main conclusion I draw from this is that we need a better
wizard, but we
knew that already.
Scott K
Total - 147
Mail-From Results:
pass - 62
none - 63
fail - 2
softfail - 3
neutral - 6
temperror - 0
permerror - 10
HELO Results:
pass - 26
fail - 0
none - 117
softfail - 1
neutral - 0
temperror - 1
permerror - 2
One of the numbers that stands out to me is the 'none - 117' under
the HELO Results category. That one tells me that the Project web
site probably needs to be clearer about that aspect of SPF policy.
As a matter of fact I think the project web site is lacking in the
area of educating people about the need to provide an SPF policy for
all their domains and sub-domains. I know it's in the FAQ but it
needs to be upfront more.
--
Gino Cerullo
Pixel Point Studios
21 Chesham Drive
Toronto, ON M3M 1W6
416-247-7740
This email address protect by SPF! Want to protect your domain's
email from forgery? Visit openspf.org
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735