spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

[spf-discuss] Re: Authentication + Reputation = Accountability

2007-07-13 02:43:04
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Meng Weng Wong wrote:
On Jul 12, 2007, at 12:45 PM, Meng Weng Wong wrote:
Those of you who have been following the authentication movement
will remember that reputation was always part of the plan.

It is the job of SPF/DKIM/etc to provide authentication.

Karmasphere's job is to provide reputation.

[...]
I am tremendously pleased.  For me, this is the culmination of
several years of work: SPF offers authentication, and Karmasphere
offers reputation.  Together, they fight spam!

Congrats, Meng!  Great job!

Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
In any case, if I were going to do this (and I actually do), I would
have the DNSWL return (set whatever bit) what auth method that the
domain is expected to use so that you can only accept SPF for domains
known to use SPF and DKIM for domains known to use DKIM, etc.

We really should get SPFv3 started so domains can declare their use of IP- 
address-based authorization (AKA SPF Classic) and/or other auth methods 
such as DKIM.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGl0hmwL7PKlBZWjsRAucUAKDjnxcKc212VUyJQhGackysMCdGRwCfZKmt
p49UhgkIolZR0l+pBtBkZSY=
=PgBz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>