--On 31 January 2008 20:11:01 +0100 Frank Ellermann
<nobody(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de> wrote:
Ian Eiloart wrote:
I guess you wouldn't bounce when you matched +all.
I would, PASS is PASS, accepting PASS "on probation"
is fine. A feature of SPF.
OH, OK. Either they've got a good reason for wanting the backscatter, or
the more they get the more likely they are to deploy a more informative
policy - perhaps. Yes, I buy that.
And, you needn't send a vacation message, either.
I've never done it, but an SPF PASS would allow it.
In theory folks can do C/R after SPF PASS. If all
mails were either PASS or FAIL adding C/R to PASS
could for a change actually work. Of course the
premise "if all mails" will be never true, so far
for that "FUSSP" ;-)
For Alexa's definition of relevant domains it's roughly
40%: http://utility.nokia.net/~lars/meter/spf.html
That's good.
+1 With 4% FAIL of the "tested" domains and 40% SPF
of the "relevant" domains it's roughly one out of ten
domains using SPF that has also -all. Not too shabby.
Frank
-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/735/=now
RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/735/
Modify Your Subscription:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?&;
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
x3148
-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/735/=now
RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/735/
Modify Your Subscription:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=2183229&id_secret=92542960-ed300b
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com