On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I maybe remembering wrong, but I thought we changed the TERM to 2 years.
I don't think so, but we don't seem to be missing much by not having had an
election. My view is we should not expend effort fixing something that's
not broken.
I agree, but there are two issues that need addressing:
1) SPFv3 (low priority)
2) An official evaluation of experience with the "experimental" RFC.
Neither really requires a council at this point, however.
--
Stuart D. Gathman <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
Business Management Systems Inc. Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.
-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/735/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/735/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com