Hi,
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com]On Behalf Of
Joerg
Heinicke
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 5:23 PM
To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [xsl] Arguments for XSL
Two more links:
http://www.xmlmind.com/xmleditor/ (another WYSIWIG editor)
http://www.xopus.org (WYSIWYG XML editing in the browser)
I don't understand why people always say 'use Xopus' ?? Is it because they say
they are Open Source? I think it does a disservice.
The Open Source version is so buggy I can't use it. I have not tried the
expensive licensed version. Has anybody had real success using Xopus? Can
average users use it?
Plus their business model seems strange to say the least. Last I checked they
offered the OS version, and if you want to pay several thousand US$ you can get
a 'less buggy' closed source version...
-Rob
Regards,
Joerg
Jeni Tennison wrote:
Hi Mark,
I've spent considerable time setting up an architecture using XML
and XSL in order to produce a help-system for one of our software
products. I feel using this system is much better than using a
WYSIWYG editor because it allows the writer to concentrate on
content and not on formatting. Formatting can be done by a different
person or at a different time via XSL style-sheets.
I've pitched this idea to my manager and he likes it but when we
sent the whole package of to our head-office abroad for translation
into different languages, they didn't like it. They prefer using a
WYSIWYG editor (specifically ROBOHELP).
My gut feel is XML is better even tho a WYSIWYG editor allows you to
see results immediately without compiling or anything.
Aside from the reasons you've already stated, XML (with XSLT) is a
good idea because:
1. If the XML is structured well, you can perform automated checks
on the content of the help, for example to make sure that every
page has a link on it.
2. You can convert the same content to many formats -- HTML,
PDF printed materials (via XSL-FO), eBook format and so on --
fairly easily.
On the WYSIWYG side, I've recently been converted to XMetaL as a way
of editing XML documents in a WYSIWYG fashion. Just because you're
using XML doesn't necessarily mean you can't edit the documents
easily and see what they're going to eventually look like.
Cheers,
Jeni
---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list