At 2002-11-18 14:24 +0000, David Carlisle wrote:
text/xsl
or
text/xml
text/xsl has never been registered (although it was used in some
examples in various documents, and it works in IE)
following the new house style for xml releated mime types it's _supposed_
to be text/xslt+xml but
text/xml
is also correct (as xslt is XML) and has the benefit of working in
IE Mozilla and netscape, so I'd use text/xml.
Is there any news on the status of RFC 3023[1] section 8.17 use of
"application/xslt+xml" for this purpose?
............... Ken
[1] http://www.faqs.org/ftp/rfc/rfc3023.txt
--
Upcoming hands-on in-depth XSLT/XPath and/or XSL-FO:
- North America: Feb 3 - Feb 7,2003
G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman(_at_)CraneSoftwrights(_dot_)com
Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/
Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0 +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995)
ISBN 0-13-065196-6 Definitive XSLT and XPath
ISBN 0-13-140374-5 Definitive XSL-FO
ISBN 1-894049-08-X Practical Transformation Using XSLT and XPath
ISBN 1-894049-10-1 Practical Formatting Using XSL-FO
Next conference training: 2002-12-08,03-03,06
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list