Mike said:
This is something that's quite tricky to do in XPath 1.0, but much
easier in XPath 2.0. Since XPath 2.0 has taken some knocking on this
list recently,
Not sure if the 'knocking' is being interpreted as it is meant Mike.
The advances that you/Jeni/DC have shown, in XSLT usage, are IMO
real developments and quite clearly wanted by the XSLT community.
Funny how we've not seen much evidence of what we are knocking,
The typing, the query oriented stuff, the schema based stuff.
I for one am genuinely grateful for the work you have done in
moving XSLT forward based on a brilliant first release.
Regards DaveP.
-
NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the
intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use,
disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your
system.
RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any
attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it
cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are
transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.
Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email
and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of RNIB.
RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227
Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list