Joerg,
I used the phrase "similar to DocBook" just to be sure that people
understand what I am trying to explain, because most people know the
DocBook stylesheets. Our actual data is *completely* different. However,
I *am* using the CALS table conversion templates from the DocBook
stylesheet distribution.
Cheers,
Jakob.
Joerg Heinicke <joerg(_dot_)heinicke(_at_)gmx(_dot_)de>@lists.mulberrytech.com
on 12/07/2002
02:10:38 AM
Veuillez répondre à xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Envoyé par : owner-xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Pour : xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
cc :
Objet : Re: [xsl] sequential navigation problem (long)
Ref. Message:
Jakob(_dot_)Fix(_at_)bureauveritas(_dot_)com wrote:
I am working on a stylesheet that's fragmenting a big document into
smaller
parts using GIs; the idea as well as navigation is very similar to the
DocBook stylesheets.
But if it is similar to DocBook, why don't you use DocBook? Too much
overhead?
Joerg
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list